UK Court Sides With Samsung In Apple Suit

Britain's Court of Appeal has affirmed a lower court ruling that Samsung's Galaxy tablet computer is "not as cool" as Apple's iPad and therefore doesn't infringe Apple's rights. The issue in the case was whether Samsung infringed on the design Apple registered in 2004.

LONDON (AP) — Britain's Court of Appeal has backed a judgment that Samsung's Galaxy tablet computer is "not as cool" as Apple's iPad — and therefore doesn't infringe Apple's rights.

The panel's upholding of the findings of by a lower court endorses the U.K. judgment which made headlines around the world when it was handed down in July. Judge Colin Birss had then gushed over Apple's design, while knocking back the company's case against its rival.

"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking," Birss wrote at the time, enthusing over its "undecorated flat surfaces," its "very thin rim" and "crisp edge."

"It is an understated, smooth and simple product," Birss wrote, saying that Samsung's products "are not as cool."

On Thursday, the Court of Appeal agreed unanimously with Birss, with Judge Robin Jacob ordering Apple to publicize the court rulings to make sure consumers knew that Samsung wasn't a copycat.

"The acknowledgement must come from the horse's mouth," Jacob said. "Nothing short of that will be sure to do the job completely."

Kim Walker, a partner with English law firm Thomas Eggar LLP, said that the ruling was an endorsement ofSamsung's originality — if not its design.

"It appears that you don't have to be cool to be original when it comes to intellectual property rights," she wrote in an email. "You just have to be different!"

The British case is just one of several in Apple and Samsung's international copyright battle, which has raged across Europe and the United States.

Earlier this month, the Court of Appeals in Washington overturned a judge's order blocking Samsung from selling its Galaxy Nexus smart phone pending a patent lawsuit by Apple. A jury in September agreed with Apple and ordered Samsung to pay $1 billion. Samsung has moved to set the judgment aside.

In September, a German court dismissed Apple's claim that Samsung and Google Inc.'s Motorola Mobility infringed patents used in touch-screen devices.

Apple applied for an injunction in the Netherlands last year regarding all three Samsung Galaxy models, the 10.1, the 8.9 and the 7.7. The court refused, Apple lost on appeal is now petitioning the Supreme Court.

Samsung went to court in Spain last year seeking a declaration of non-infringement. Apple is challenging Spain's jurisdiction, and the case has not resulted in any ruling so far.

More in Industry 4.0