Create a free account to continue

Armstrong’s ‘Flying Bedstead’ Close Call

We’ve slowed down our innovative cycle for the sake of playing it safe, seeing how things will be in another five, 10 years.

By JOEL HANS, Managing Editor,

Amid news that a true hero, Neil Armstrong, had passed away last week, I — like many Americans likely have — did some soul-searching into what variables add together to equate to a life well-lived. Regardless of what the individual components are for each of us, there’s little question that Armstrong had a preponderance of them, if not them all. His legacy should stand alongside the most famous explorers in human history, such as Erik the Red, Magellan or, putting aside the human rights violations, Columbus. Armstrong’s name should stand for hundreds of years, if we do things right.

And that legacy only exists because Armstrong was a master of taking calculated risks. Based on his storied pre-NASA career in the Korean War and as a test pilot, Armstrong was the kind of person who pushed the limits of possibility, but only because he seemed confident that he’d emerge relatively unscathed.

Amid his untimely passing, and the recent landing of the Curiosity rover on Mars, many are wondering if America is bound to experience a “renaissance” in passion for space exploration. I hope that turns out to be the case, but I have my doubts. We’re just not a nation that is willing to take risks anymore. We’ve slowed down our innovative cycle for the sake of playing it safe, seeing how things will be in another five, 10 years.

But back in Armstrong’s prime, innovation was a matter of national pride, of maintaining the United States’ position as the world’s biggest hotbed of technological advancement. And Armstrong was completely swept up in this fervor, and the risk-taking it required. His name might have meant far, far less — or nothing at all — if one of his many test flights had gone a little differently. In perusing his long piloting career, he had numerous close calls onboard a variety of aircraft. One, however, was very closely associated with his landing on the moon. And we have video of it.

The day was May 6, 1968. Armstrong was conducting training flights on board the lunar landing research vehicle (LLRV) — more casually called a Flying Bedstead — at a Houston-area Air Force base. The LLRVs were not prototypes, but rather training crafts. Now, Armstrong was no stranger to flying crafts that had not been fully vetted, but during a training flight more than a year before his moon landing, Armstrong nearly lost his life strapped into one of the LLRVs.

I'd recommend you go check out the video itself at the Air & Space blog from the Smithsonian:

Otherwise, you can settle for some images:

In the first 20 seconds of the clip, we see a young — dare I say dashing — Armstrong, replete with well-manicured hair, shaking hands and smiling just before the test flight. And then the insect-looking craft takes flight vertically on a single jet engine, and he genuinely looks like he’s at the helm of some machine that, even today, is more science fiction than reality.

By 30 seconds, he’s reached a height of what looks like a few hundred feet — presumably enough to get an accurate feel for the way the craft would descend. As the craft slowly floats back down over the next half-minute, one can see Armstrong actuating various hydrogen peroxide rockets to stabilize the craft. He nearly approaches the ground, but appears to ascend once more, and here is where the craft begins to sway irregularly.

The Smithsonian says that a leaking propellant caused Armstrong’s flight controls to fail completely, evidenced in the way the LLRV quickly lurches forward, and then back, as Armstrong, presumably, tries to counteract the unforeseen action. Finally, he ejects as the LLRV plummets into the ground and erupts in a fireball. The anecdote goes that he escaped with only a sore tongue, having bitten it during ejection.

Armstrong biographer James Hansen, in his book First Man, writes that just an hour after the incident, Armstrong was back at work in his office. Fellow astronaut Alan Bean said, “I can’t think of another person, let alone another astronaut, who would have just gone back to his office after ejecting a fraction of a second before getting killed.”

To me, that’s the perfect exemplification of someone who understood the risk of his current predicament. Armstrong knew he could die when he strapped into that LLRV, but he also knew that he was an expert pilot who had the last-ditch option of ejecting to relative safety. He also knew that these simulation flights would give him critical experience when it came to flying the actual moon lander during the Apollo 11 mission. And flying to the moon was the ultimate risk of all — going where no human had gone before.

While we shouldn’t unnecessarily risk human life by throwing would-be Moon (or Mars) explorers out beyond Earth’s gravitational pull, we should take note of what Armstrong and his compatriots did, and more specifically, how they did it. For someone who was most certainly not alive when Armstrong stepped onto the moon and made it back safety, that’s the way I’ll choose to remember him. I hope others will do the same, and we can start to remember that one doesn’t get to great places by coasting, but rather flying.

Just make sure you’re sitting in an ejection seat.

What’s your take? Please feel free to email [email protected] or comment below!