MnetTV          Digital Library

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net


Resources
Association Links
Bookstore
Career Center
Digital Library
Events Calendar
What’s New
White Papers


News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
People in the News

MNet Career Center

Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive/Transportation
Chemical/Petroleum
Food/Beverage
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals/Biotech
Plastics/Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Electrical & Electronics
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Amazon

About Us
Editorial Contacts
Advertise with Us

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week



U.S. Unemployment Rate Climbs To 9.8 Percent
By Christopher S. Rugaber, AP Economics Writer
Manufacturing.Net - October 02, 2009

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The unemployment rate rose to 9.8 percent in September, the highest since June 1983, as employers cut far more jobs than expected.

The report is evidence that the worst recession since the 1930s is still inflicting widespread pain and underscores one of the biggest threats to the nascent economic recovery: that consumers, worried about job losses and stagnant wages, will restrain spending. Consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of the nation's economy.

The Labor Department said Friday that the economy lost a net total of 263,000 jobs last month, from a downwardly revised 201,000 in August. That's worse than Wall Street economists' expectations of 180,000 job losses, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

The unemployment rate rose from 9.7 percent in August, matching expectations.

"The labor market is still going backwards," economist Joel Naroff, president of Naroff Economic Advisors, wrote in a note to clients.

The report also points to an uneven economic rebound, analysts said.

"We remain convinced that we are in the early stages of an economic recovery," said Michelle Meyer, an economist at Barclays Capital. But today's report "suggests the recovery will be bumpy in the beginning."

If laid-off workers who have settled for part-time work or have given up looking for new jobs are included, the unemployment rate rose to 17 percent, the highest on records dating from 1994.

According to a separate report Friday, U.S. factory orders fell in August by the largest amount in five months.

The Commerce Department said demand for manufactured goods dropped 0.8 percent, much worse than the 0.7 percent gain that economists had expected. The August decline reflected plunging demand for commercial aircraft, a category that surged in July.

The weak reports sent the stock market down in morning trading. The Dow Jones Industrial average fell 49 points, while broader indexes also declined.

More than a half-million unemployed people gave up looking for work last month. Had they continued searching, the official jobless rate would have been higher.

The number of people out of work for six months or longer jumped to a record 5.4 million, and they now make up almost 36 percent of the unemployed — also a record.

All told, 15.1 million Americans are now out of work, the department said. And more than 7.2 million jobs have been eliminated since the recession began in December 2007.

Many analysts expect the economy grew at a healthy clip in the July-September quarter, technically ending the recession, but few think the recovery will be strong enough to lower the jobless rate. Most economists expect the rate to top 10 percent and keep climbing.

The economy has received a boost from the Cash for Clunkers auto rebate program and other government stimulus efforts, but many economists believe that growth will slow in the current quarter and early next year as the impact of those programs fade.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Thursday that even if the economy were to grow at a 3 percent pace in the coming quarters, it would not be enough to quickly drive down the unemployment rate. Bernanke said the rate is likely to remain above 9 percent through the end of 2010.

Besides the sagging jobs market, other potential obstacles to a smooth recovery include wary consumers, the troubled commercial real estate market, and a tight lending environment for individuals and businesses, said Eric Rosengren, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

"These challenges will likely make the recovery rather restrained by historical standards, with subdued levels of spending and lending continuing to hold back a more rapid recovery," Rosengren said in a speech in Boston on Friday.

Against that backdrop, key monetary and fiscal policy supports will need to be keep in place to help foster a recovery, Rosengren said.

Hourly earnings rose by a penny last month, while weekly wages fell $1.54 to $616.11, according to the government data.

The average hourly work week fell back to a record low of 33 in September. That figure is important because economists are looking for companies to add more hours for current workers before they hire new ones.

The uncertainty that surrounds the recovery has made employers reluctant to hire. The Business Roundtable, a group of CEOs from large corporations, said earlier this week that only 13 percent of its members expect to increase hiring over the next six months.

While job losses have slowed since the first quarter of this year when they averaged 691,000 a month, the cuts actually worsened last month in many sectors compared with August.

Construction jobs fell by 64,000, more than the 60,000 eliminated in August. And service sector companies cut 147,000 jobs, more than double the 69,000 in the previous month. Retailers lost 38,500 jobs, compared to less than 9,000 in August.

Government jobs fell 53,000, the report said, with local governments cutting the most.

Temporary help agencies eliminated 1,700 jobs, down from the previous month, but still a sign of labor market weakness. Economists see temporary jobs as a leading indicator, as employers are likely to hire temp workers before permanent ones.

President Barack Obama said in a speech earlier this week that his $787 billion stimulus package and other efforts have "broken our economic freefall," though he acknowledged the labor market hasn't improved.

Republicans charge that continued job losses are evidence that the stimulus was an expensive failure.

AP Economics Writer Jeannine Aversa contributed to this report.


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 14 User Comments
Add a Comment
How can this be? Pres. O promised . ..  10/2/2009 11:36:00 AM
In lobbying for the so-called "stimulus" bill, did not President Obama say that with the passage of the bill, unemployment would not get above 8%?
Recovery?  10/2/2009 11:45:00 AM
People and groups like the AP keep saying the "recovery" is here. There is no recovery happening. Businesses are laying off people right and left to compensate for the damaged economy brought forth by the policies of the Obama administration and Democrats in general. Actual recovery will start when these people are no longer in power, so that businesses can once again believe that the central Federal government will not punish them for investing in their businesses. No investment equals no hiring, and outright downsizing. Fall of 2010 will see our economy begin to actually recover, unless another Smoot-Hawley act is passed by the idiots in Congress and the White House (think Chinese tire tariffs).
Recovery ?  10/2/2009 12:32:00 PM
Great Post, you nailed it.. We have to get these people out of office, businesses are holding on trying to survive. Waiting for the people to wake up and get serious about saving this great country..You unemployed idiots that voted for this change, will not be getting another stimulus hand out, the money is all gone..The banks have it and they are not giving it to you..We are in a complete freeze until 2010..Thanks..
WHAT?!?  10/2/2009 12:38:00 PM
But Barack said it was OVER! Now what?
"How can this be?" - One Word: China  10/2/2009 12:49:00 PM
No stimulus plan is going to help against the massive exodus of jobs to China and other overseas countries. Our country has a big gaping wound that is bleeding jobs weekly, and Obama's government has done nothing to resolve the situation. Don't get me wrong, I voted for Obama, and I believe he is trying, but I think he should not be focusing on healthcare. Instead, bring jobs back to the US, so that government-paid healthcare is not necessary.
RE:What?!?  10/2/2009 12:51:00 PM
Come on people, enough Obama bashing. How exactly would you fix what the great president Bush created?? We would not be in this mess if it weren't for his great eight years!
"Read My Lips No unemployment over 8.5%"   10/2/2009 12:59:00 PM
Again this show the lack of governence this administration truly has. Instead of pushing socialistic policies like health care and extension of unemployment benefits. The Fed should be looking for ways to get the people working again. Even the greatest Socialist economy in the world the USSR new the value of human labor. This group just doesn't get it. This is this generation's Jimmy Carter. Who will be the Ronald Reagan to lead the country out of this mess? If it lasts that long.
Recovery?  10/2/2009 1:04:00 PM
I think we should get the individuals that had been running the country back so that they can finish us off with their deficit spending and let business handle the problem mentality. Surplus in 2000, record deficit in 2008? Trillions in debt chasing an idiot in a cave and a figurehead leader of a boxed silly country in the Mideast. Until this my party your party sparring ends, we will be held hostage by do nothing legislators that are only interested in advancing their lobbyists agenda. With baseless posts like yours fueling the fires of idiocy.
RE: Recovery  10/2/2009 1:09:00 PM
I hate to bring this up, but the economy crashed before Obama took office. So how is he responsible? It’s the policies of the last eight years that brought us to where we are now. It took Bush Eight years to trash the economy. Do you expect this administration to fix it over night? Since the economy is driven by consumer confidence the GOP need to hold for on the fear they love to spread. A scared public is always bad for business and the only message they have lately is how bat it is and how much worse it’s going to get. I don’t here any NEW solutions to the problems Just fear.
Response to What  10/2/2009 1:33:00 PM
Sorry, but the time for blaming Bush is far over. Mr. Obama now owns this. And the rest of the responses are dead on. His socialistic policies and the continuing practice of driving us further into debt will only deepen the economic issue. Biden's lies of a rosy picture won't solve it. Obama tryiung to spend us out of it won't solve it. You must create an atmosphere that companies want to stay here and operate in the U.S. and find ways to level the playing field to persuade companies not to move to China, India, Vietnam. Assaulting capitalism won't do that. Adding more taxation won't do that. Cap and trade won't do that. A massive expenditure to support a gigantic new health care system won't do that. Penalizing people for being successful won't do that. Reditribution of wealth won't do that. Killing the middle class won't do that. Wake up America!
Blame Who?  10/2/2009 4:51:00 PM
Obama inherits a country on the verge of a depression and Bush is off the hook after 9 months? Narrow minded thinking at best, sinister at worst. Clinton was blamed for everything that was wrong in the US for the last 8 years. Why is the unemployment in the EU countries with socialized health care (not the hardly socialist public funded insurance option proposed here), France, England, Germany,etc., hovering at 8% while the anti-socialist US at 10%? It seems that Social Democracies might be able to avoid the hills and valleys? Maybe the right wing screamers need to use their brains instead of their mouths and pens. Why is it so patriotic to trumpet Obama failure rather than quietly hoping for the new approach to fix the damage done by the last approach? Do we go back to the pretending that because there are Republicans in power everything will be good for business? Wake up, the answers are not at the ends of the political spectrum.
Not Obama's fault.  10/2/2009 5:24:00 PM
Please folk's. You all are just sad that you lost the election. I can not believe the angry vast right wing people posting to this site. I am proud to see Obama changing the power structure in this country. I have been happily employed by A.C.O.R.N. and before that I worked on the Cash for clunker program, I have been employed more than I was before, when I came over from Mexico about three years ago. Now look at me, I am posting on a site and productive in the community. Obama is our man. Finally we have a man who is for the illegal aliens, the underprivilged and under appreciated. Viva Obama.
Get Politically Educated  10/2/2009 10:15:00 PM
Electing a communist to office never ends a recession.You get what you vote for; a Soviet style lifestyle than continues to get worse. Greed and Envy, anyone?
For those who didn't follow the time lines,  10/5/2009 3:52:00 PM
the Republicans began warning about a potential problem with Freddie and Fannie in 2001 ... nothing was done. Warning were sounded again in 2003 ... nothing done. Warnings of dire consequences (by Alan Greenspan) were issued in 2005, but the Demos didn't want to disrupt the "give everybody a house" mandate that the Clinton administration had given the two entities. Freddie was sighted by an auditor for illegal accounting practices in 2006. The Demos immediately formed a linch mob and got rid of the auditor. In 2008, Republicans authored and passed out of committee a regulation measure for Freddie and Fannie ... but they never brought it up for a vote. Who's responsible for the mess we're in? Both parties ... at some time or other. We need to forget about party affiliations. If they're in, vote 'em out in 2010.


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

 

     



   





Flatbed trucking, flatbed shipping, flatbed carriers



Pharmaceuticals/Biotech

Glaxo Vaccine Unit Makes Executive Changes

Montana Wants To Import Drugs From Canada

Merck Says Vytorin Study To Continue


Aerospace

Britain 'Disappointed' With U.S. Tanker Bid

Boeing 747-8 Freighter Passes Test Milestone

Gates 'Regrets' Northrop Decision On Tanker Bid

Automotive/Transportation

Wabash National Hires Temp Workers

LG Chem To Make Battery Cells In Michigan

GM's Lutz: Hybrid SUVs, Trucks Are Future
News Video