Loading...

 

 
Loading...

    

   
               MnetTV          

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net
Loading...


Resources
About Us
Advertise With Us
Association Links
Audio
Blogs
Bookstore
Career Center
Editorial Contacts
Events Calendar
Videos
What’s New
White Papers

News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Gulf Oil Spill Coverage
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
New Products
Offbeat News
People in the News

Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive & Transportation
Chemical & Petroleum
Electrical & Electronics
Food & Beverage
Heavy Machinery
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals & Biotech
Plastics & Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Alternative Energy Industry Expected To Take Off
By Oskar Garcia, Associated Press Writer
Manufacturing.Net - August 10, 2009

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague
Loading...

LAS VEGAS (AP) -- Labor Secretary Hilda Solis said Monday that she believes hiring in the alternative energy industry will pick up in the next 12 months, but it will take longer than that for so-called green jobs to become a bigger part of the U.S. job market.

Solis told The Associated Press that new government incentives will kick-start hiring in the fledgling industry as companies regain confidence and find it easier to borrow money.

"Once you start seeing more investments made in our economy recovering, as we stabilize and we get people back to work, then I think there'll be more interest in expanding," Solis said. "There'll be more, hopefully, credit available for this expansion, because there will be more confidence because that's what we're lacking right now -- that investment and confidence in the market."

After a terrible start to the year there are signs of a rebound for alternative energy, in part because of a push from the Obama administration.

The second National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas drew a high-profile list of alternative energy backers, including former President Bill Clinton, Energy Secretary Steven Chu and U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

"The economic crisis, the security crisis and the climate crisis are all intertwined, and the common thread running through them is our absurd and dangerous overdependence on carbon-based fuels," said Al Gore, Clinton's vice president.

"If your grab hold of that thread and pull on it all three of these crises will unravel, and we'll hold in our hand the solution to all three of them -- that is to make a transition to a low-carbon economy and to put people to work doing it," he said.

Venture capitalists increased investments in alternative energy by 73 percent over the past three months compared with the first three months of the year, according to a report issued late last month by Ernst & Young LLP. Yet investors are still shaken and the money flowing into green energy companies remains meager compared with last year at this time.

Polls have shown that as the economy worsened, Americans were less enthusiastic about environmental policies that would come at the expense of jobs and a better economy.

That has created a rift between political leaders at the state and federal levels as to how aggressively the U.S. should push green jobs.

Money had already begun to flow into the sector at a record pace last year before new government initiatives were announced, but also before the full weight of the recession became apparent.

Wind, solar and other alternative energy companies have been forced to cut back on workers. Projects were canceled as credit markets froze and venture capital evaporated.

John Woolard, president and CEO of Bright Source Energy, Inc., said his company and competitors looking to develop high-scale solar energy projects need the full support of lawmakers press ahead with its projects and immediately create jobs.

"We need to transition from visionary leadership to roll-up-your-sleeves leadership," Woolard said.

The Obama administration last week announced $2.4 billion in federal grants to develop next-generation electric vehicles and batteries.

Michigan, which has been devastated by job losses in the auto industry, would see companies within its borders get $1 billion in federal grants with the administration pushing green jobs as part of its economic cure.

The alternative energy sector could spark a new "industrial revolution," with better prospects for minorities and new training for workers with traditional vocational skills, Solis said.

There has rapid growth in the industry, but employment in the green business still makes up only half of one percent of all jobs.

Solis said that slice would grow not only as more jobs are created, but as officials identify more existing positions that have become green jobs.

"It affects every facet of our life," Solis said. "So without a doubt it will have a much greater impact than the 1 percent that we're talking about."


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 9 User Comments
Add a Comment
Popular myth  8/10/2009 4:47:00 PM
An engineering publication should recognize that using inefficient energy sources is actually a WASTE of energy. Using more concentrated forms such as nuclear, coal, oil etc is much more productive. Carbon Dioxide, over countless billions of years was converted to plant growth and ultimate present fuel harvest! To say that we must only use the sun energy on a day to day basis is ludicrous! Will it keep people busy? Of course just as Collective Farms did but the resulting horror is often dismissed!
National Security   8/11/2009 6:06:00 AM
Concentrated energy sources are needed for high volume transportation. Airliners won't run on solar power and electric tractor trailers won’t go too far on a charge. We also need to stop supporting the terrorist states with our addiction to cheap oil. The use of renewables energy sources where ever possible and judiciously use of domestic concentrated energy sources would allow us to have profitable industry, clean air and stop sending our energy dollars out of the country. Many people don't look past the next paycheck let alone worry about their grandchildren’s future; they want cheap and they want it now. Our country could be poised to manufacture and sell energy solutions to the rest of the world when cheap oil runs out.
to:"Popular myth"   8/11/2009 7:46:00 AM
You've got to be an oil or coal employee. Do you really know what you're paying for with these "dirty" fuels. Did you count the military, EPA, acid rain damage, environmental impact (strip mines, spills, etc.). Hydrogen, wind, solar = sustainable clean distributed generation / use of power. Too much electricity - split water, store H2. For those who want to keep supporting the middle east (geophysical fact) I question your motives.
Alternative Energy  8/11/2009 9:02:00 AM
Bill Clinton had eight years to implement positive change with U.S.energy policy and did "nothing"! As for Al Gore, he is a joke! The amount of energy required to grow, process and cook the excessive amount of food that is obviously consumed by him and Tipper would be a significant reduction in wasteful energy use. Politicians, both Democrats and Republicans, prefer to grandstand rather than involving scientists and engineers in the solution of this much debated and important issue. There is still a vacuum concerning leadership.
to: Popular myth  8/11/2009 2:20:00 PM
I agree, and to "to popular myth" I'm into nuclear
Involve scientists & engineers  8/11/2009 2:31:00 PM
So what's Dr. Steve Chu (Director of DOE), chopped liver?
to; popular myth  8/11/2009 3:54:00 PM
The idea behind alternative energy is not high efficiency. It's having energy when nonrenewables run out.
popular myth  8/11/2009 4:16:00 PM
Nuclear, domestic drilling, and real science get my vote.
Myths? More like political disinformation!  8/12/2009 2:20:00 PM
To the first poster in this string, you are quite right, and if I may exterpolate upon the CO2 myth, If the atmosphere were somehow with zero CO2, it wouldn't be long before all greenery was dead, as they take in CO2, as pointed out above, store the carbon, make sugars and give off the by product of oxygen. At a later date, sometimes much, much later, the carbon is harvested in the form of fossil fuels, or the tree, grass or whatever is burned directly for fuel. As for having adequate fuels to serve the USA now and in the future, we need to give up some of our prejudices...some based on no or wrong information, and do what is cost effective and practical. In my own order of preference, that would be neuclear generated electricity, hydroelectric power generation, and harvest our own oil, and coal. There is, world wide no, shortage of fossil fuel energy, and we have large untapped reserves in our own country, and undersea. There's enough coal in the USA to last us untold centuries. Solar and wind power on the other hand, are not dependable sources of power, ane either one is very expensive to develop, with solar at present costing about $2 per watt for hardware. TVA, several years ago started building a hydroelectric dam on the Columbia River, but the project was stopped because some alarmists protested that it would doom a creature known as a Snail Darter, and it was so rare that said river was the only place it could be found. Eventually, the very well financed opposition to the dam won, with TVA actually removing the dam and restoring the area. A VERY expensive boondoggle! Funny thing...as soon as the last of the concrete was removed, snail darters were found to exist in numerous sites! I cite this because, while it is desirable to be sensitive about our environment, it is necessary to not theorize, but to KNOW what the facts are. We tend to jump on the bandwagon for any environmental cause, if it has been proven to exist or not. We all need to spend more time contemplating the consequences of any CHANGE instead of saying that "All change is good".


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

Loading...

 

     



  

Loading...

 


Loading...


Loading...

Most Popular News Stories of the Week
Loading...