MnetTV          Digital Library

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net
Today in Manufacturing.Net

Resources
Association Links
Bookstore
Career Center
Digital Library
Events Calendar
What’s New
White Papers

Browse White Papers


News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
People in the News

MNet Career Center

Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive/Transportation
Chemical/Petroleum
Food/Beverage
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals/Biotech
Plastics/Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Electrical & Electronics
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Amazon

About Us
Editorial Contacts
Advertise with Us

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week



 


Mnet house ad 120x240



WTO To Probe EU Ban On U.S. Poultry
By Bradley S. Klapper, Associated Press Writer
Manufacturing.Net - November 19, 2009

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague


GENEVA (AP) -- The World Trade Organization opened investigations Thursday into a European Union ban on American poultry, and U.S. labeling rules for cattle and hog imports from Canada and Mexico.

In a dispute meeting dominated by agriculture, the WTO set up panels to review the poultry and country-of-origin labeling complaints and deliver rulings within nine months.

The global trade arbiter also authorized Brazil to raise tariffs on U.S. goods to punish the U.S. for providing American cotton growers with billions of dollars in illegal subsidies.

In the poultry case, Washington and Brussels have argued for more than a decade over EU restrictions on imports of poultry treated with four anti-bacterial chemicals: chlorine dioxide, acidified sodium chloride, trisodium phosphate and peroxyacids.

Each has been approved for poultry processing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Agriculture Department, but the 27-nation bloc has banned poultry carcasses processed with such treatments since 1997.

The U.S. took the dispute to the WTO in the final days of ex-President George W. Bush's tenure, when it was seen largely as a farewell gift from the Bush administration to the American farm lobby and a final insult to the EU after years of sometimes bitter trade and political disputes. It was inherited by the Obama administration, which has gone ahead with the case.

Canada and Mexico, meanwhile, are hoping the WTO will rule against a U.S. decision last year to no longer allow Mexican and Canadian calves that are raised and slaughtered in the United States to qualify as being cattle of U.S. origin. They say the law poses an unfair impediment to fair competition, but Washington defends it as a legitimate way to provide greater customer information.

The WTO cannot force countries to comply with its rulings, but it can authorize commercial sanctions against nations continuing to break the rules.

Trade cases generally take years to reach sanctions, as illustrated by the WTO's authorization Thursday for Brazil to target U.S. products from fruits, juices and medicine as retaliation in a cotton dispute that dates back to 2002.

The total value of the sanctions remained unclear.

The WTO ruled in August that American goods could face $295 million in annual penalties as a result of the illegal U.S. cotton subsidies paid in 2006, but said the sanction level should be recalculated each year as support programs expand or decrease.

Brazil says subsidy programs have increased since then, meaning it can raise tariffs on goods and target U.S. patents and trademarks. The Latin American country says the U.S. has provided payment details from 2008. But Brazil wants the most current information on subsidies so that it can set sanctions appropriately.


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 1 User Comments
Add a Comment
Socialist unfair trade practices  11/20/2009 12:34:00 PM
Exported American goods are fully burdened with the costs of providing full medical/healthcare and retirement for the labor that produces them. But, are we allowed to apply a tariff on goods from socialist nations where these benefits are SUBSIDIZED by their government? What is the WTO's stance on this unfair trade practice?


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

 

     



   





Flatbed trucking, flatbed shipping, flatbed carriers



Other Manufacturing

Maine Mill Workers Agree To Pay Cut

Georgia Apparel Maker Shuts Down

BAE Systems Closing Tennessee Plant


Automotive/Transportation

Toyota Recalls 437,000 Hybrids

House Toyota Hearing Postponed

State Farm Warned Of Toyota Problem In 2007

Metals

Rio Tinto Sells Ghana Bauxite Stake To Chinese Firm

Cadmium Found In Adult Jewelry

Alcoa Realigns Business Units, Adds COOs
News Video