MnetTV          Digital Library

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net
Today in Manufacturing.Net

Resources
Association Links
Bookstore
Digital Library
Events Calendar
Job Search
White Papers

Browse White Papers


News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
People in the News

Job Search


Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive/Transportation
Chemical/Petroleum
Food/Beverage
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals/Biotech
Plastics/Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Electrical & Electronics
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Amazon

About Us
Editorial Contacts
Advertise with Us

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week



 


Mnet house ad 120x240



U.S. Automakers Try To Win Over Congress
By Ken Thomas, Associated Press Writer
Manufacturing.Net - December 04, 2008

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Humbled U.S. automakers pleaded with Congress Thursday for an expanded $34 billion rescue package, but heard fresh skepticism in a bumpy encore appearance. "We made mistakes, which we're learning from," General Motors chief executive Rick Wagoner told the Senate Banking Committee.

United Auto Worker union President Ron Gettelfinger warned bluntly that in the absence of action by Congress: "I believe we could lose General Motors by the end of this month." He said the situation was dire and that time was of the essence.

Ford CEO Alan Mulally also acknowledged big mistakes, saying his company's mantra once was "You build it, they will come."

"We produced more vehicles than our customers wanted, then slashed prices," he said. But as a result of these past mistakes, "we are really focused," he said.

The Big Three executives made the trip from Detroit in new-model hybrid autos made by their respective companies, two weeks after a botched appeal for $25 billion in which they were chided for flying on private jets to beg for money.

Chrysler CEO Bob Nardelli promised that his company, recipient of a previous government-subsidized rescue loan in the 1970s that it repaid, would repay taxpayers by 2012 and would devote itself to manufacturing "fuel-efficient cars and trucks that people want to buy."

Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the senior Republican on the panel, complained that the pricetag on the package had jumped since the trio last appeared just two weeks ago. He pressed the automakers to explain why, and to justify how such aid would not simply "prop up a failed business model for a few months ... and how are you going to pay it back to the taxpayers?"

Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., supports helping the industry, but said that detailed plans submitted earlier this week on how the companies would use low-cost federal loans to reorganize still left a lot of questions unanswered.

But Dodd also said that doing nothing "plays Russian roulette with the entire economy of the United States."

Several lawmakers in both parties, including Dodd, have pressed the automakers in recent days to consider a so-called "pre-packaged" bankruptcy in which they would negotiate with creditors in advance and downsize, then file for Chapter 11 protection in hopes of emerging quickly as stronger companies. The Big Three have publicly shunned the notion, but executives have indicated in recent days that it might ultimately be necessary.

GM's survival plan envisions an administration-led restructuring overseen by a government oversight board.

"If more extensive restructuring is required, GM will work with the oversight board to determine the additional necessary actions," GM's written plan said.

Gettelfinger told the committee, "We are prepared to do our part." But he also said workers for the auto companies shouldn't have to make disproportionate sacrifices.

Congressional Democrats have urged the administration to tap into an already enacted $700 billion financial bailout program to help the auto industry. The administration has said that it has no intention of doing so, and would prefer aid be taken from an earlier $25 billion program to help the industry retool its plants to make their vehicles more fuel-efficient.

Congressional budget analysts, however, have privately told top Democrats that tapping that program wouldn't come close to covering the $34 billion that carmakers now say they need to survive. It would yield only $10 billion to $15 billion in short-term loans, the analysts claimed, according to congressional officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose the analysis.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has said that the main $700 billion bailout program is intended only to be used for the financial industry.

Gene L. Dodaro, the top official at Congress' watchdog agency -- the Government Accountability Office -- agreed with Dodd that the $700 billion package set up in October "is worded broadly enough" to permit it to be tapped for the automakers.

Dodaro testified that the Federal Reserve also has the authority under existing law to make loans to the domestic auto industry if it so chooses.

Dodd said that both Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had been invited to testify at Thursday's hearing, but had declined.

Earlier, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said prospects for Congress to act this year seemed slim.

"I just don't think we have the votes to do that now," he told The Associated Press.

The Big Three are struggling to stay afloat during the longest economic downturn in at least a quarter century, a steep decline in sales and a tight credit market. The three burned through nearly $18 billion in cash reserves during the last quarter.

The bailout remains unpopular with the public. Sixty-one percent oppose providing the auto companies with billions in federal assistance, according to a CNN-Opinion Research Corp. poll released on Wednesday. Fifty-three percent said it would not help the country's economy.

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Erica Werner and Jennifer Loven in Washington, Kimberly S. Johnson in Detroit, and Joe Milicia in Cleveland contributed to this report.


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 12 User Comments
Add a Comment
US Automakers  12/4/2008 12:18:00 PM
as a taxpayer i do not want to invest into companies that are slaves to big greedy Labor Unions. If we bail out the automakers the UAW as well as all the other labor unions will be popping the cork on bottles of champagne because they will have a huge bargining chip at their next contract talks. If we do not meet their demands of restoring all of their outrageous benefits such as VEBAs, job bank program, 100% Health care, 40% pay raises they will hold this Gov and the taxpayers hostage by going on strike!! No bail out!!
Chrysler saw the light.  12/4/2008 12:18:00 PM
I own a 2007 Chrysler Sebring and it is a great car that is based upon Japanese, Korean, and American technology. The Dual VVT 4-cylinder engine has more power & economy than Toyota or Honda, but the credible image is not there yet. Catchup is a tough order, but Chrysler looked to jump ahead. Unfortunately, it may take years to erase negative images that customers have of American cars. No easy solution to this problem.
More More More  12/4/2008 12:21:00 PM
What a joke that we have the biggest crooks in Washington presiding over these hearings. Dodd is a joke. That clown has had all kinds of sweetheart deals with Fannie and Freddie. Why do the people keep these malcontents in office. The Big 3 got themselves in this mess, why do WE the taxpayers get to bailout these losers and the losers on Wall Street? Where is the help for all us working stiffs that pay their bills every week. There isn't any. Hey Paulson, I want a few million to balance my books. So much for change. America will soon be a welfare state. AS long as the same "old tools" are camped out in Washington and all the lobby crooks are stuffing their pockets, NOTHING will change. Get ready for higher taxes and more unemployment! I think the biggest losers in this deal are the American people. As long as Reid, Polisi, Dodd, Frank, and all the other "do nothings" are in Washington, this country will continue to go to the dogs. We need term limits BAD. Four years tops, and then you're GONE! This has turned into a mockery. These clowns get a gig for life and great beni's while we shelp to make a living. Once these parsites are in Washington they never leave, why should they their just like the UAW. Give me, Give me, Give me. Take, Take Take. I'm tired of not getting MY money's worth. This is the "DO NOTHING 8% CONGRESS we're talking about.
Big 3 is the backbone of US manufacturing.  12/4/2008 12:28:00 PM
Are the BIG 3 perfect? No. Have the BIG 3 made mistakes in their business model? Yes. Did the UAW contribute to the position the BIG 3 are in today? Indeed. Did the irresponsible lending practices of the now bailed out financial sector play a part in the BIG 3's problems? You better believe it! Yes, it's certainly convenient for Congressmen & Senators who enjoy a financially bullet proof career, even though they've been mismanaging the tax payer's funds for years, to sit back and ask "Why should we help you"? It's even easier to ask those questions when your voter base doesn't include hunderds of thousands of constituants who stand to lose their jobs, their homes and ultimately their dignity if the BIG 3 are allowed to fail.
Bailout  12/4/2008 12:45:00 PM
I don't remember anyone bailing out Flint Mich. when GM pulled out to build plants in Mexico and where ever. Now they ( GM,FORD and MOPAR) are talking about more foreign parts, etc. They are not interested in restructoring or changing a bit. They want the status quo maintained to keep up their foney baloney jobs and life style. Let them file for chapter 11 and do a proper restruction of those companies.
Humbled U.S. automakers ?  12/4/2008 1:02:00 PM
Rick Wagoner's salary -$1.55 plus million, and $14.4 plus million in other compensations. Alan Mulally's salary $2 million plus $18.5 million other compensations. Bob Nardelli received $210 million severance from Home Depot. "BOY HOWDY !" One would think they would have enough stashed back for a rainy day to float their own. Very Humbling Trio...HUH ?
Chris Dodd  12/4/2008 1:21:00 PM
“Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., who supports helping the industry, said that a failure of one or more of the domestic automakers "would affect every sector of our economy."” Chris Dodd?! Are you kidding me? Why does anyone even listen to this joker any more? Didn't he already prove his market knowledge in the Freddie and Fannie colaspe? Good business thrives on real market demand not government intervention and manipulation. The open market is the only real democratic power that the general public has any more.
Both are at fault  12/4/2008 1:22:00 PM
To me automakers and the politicians are at fault. As it says it is very hard to clap with one hand. At this moment what ever the struggle is just a show business so that they can play the card game. Not a single politician or the car maker has a hart for you as a common man.
The whole problem is this do nothing Congress   12/4/2008 1:39:00 PM
If Congress worried less about the hoax of global warming and more about the welfare of the United States we would not have a Big 3 problem now. If we drilled for our natural resources and brought them on line gas would never have gotten to $4 plus a gallon price because the supply side could have been regulated to match demand.Car and truck sales would not have gone into a nose dive because gas would have been affordable. We should have drilled if for nothing else but to give us more time to work on other alternative fuel sources rather than put unrealistic demands on the auto industry. Instead we have a bunch of left wing radicals like Pelosi, B. Frank, Dodd and Charlie S. who put our country at risk every day with their petty political agenda these people need voted out of office and tomorrow would not be soon enough.
Depression?  12/4/2008 3:08:00 PM
Now the 3 are warning of the potential for a depression to hit if Uncle Sam doesn't pony up some cash. Well truth be known is we are heading for a depression ANYWAY. No bailout will fix that. The sooner this whole crooked financial and corporate system hits rock bottom, the sooner we can rebuild it with hopefully better people. Of course when the depression does come it probably won't be admittedly recognized by the economists till a year later just like the recession we're in now is now being established as starting back in 2006.
Where did the money go?  12/10/2008 2:46:00 PM
BELOW IS EXTRACTED FROM THE ARTICLE: ...would prefer aid be taken from an earlier $25 billion program to help the industry retool its plants to make their vehicles more fuel-efficient. Congressional budget analysts, however, have privately told top Democrats that tapping that program wouldn't come close to covering the $34 billion that carmakers now say they need to survive. It would yield only $10 billion to $15 billion in short-term loans, the analysts claimed.... ************** The way I read this, $25B was allocated for retooling. Now, we're told that this will only yield $10B to $15B in short-term loans. I can only conclude that 1) there is a hell of discount rate, 2) there is a hell of a lot of "overhead" associated with these loans, or 3) somebody has already stolen the rest of it.
U.A.W.  12/10/2008 2:54:00 PM
The bailout is for the union and the workers. We have workers in other companies that have to pay for their insurance and retirement while they work. At retirement if they were lucky they saved in retirement plans. Now they are 65 they have topay for part B And part D. The auto industries and our goverment already pay the auto retirees part of medicare. Now they want tax payers to pay it all.They say during WWII we made war equiptment,well all military had to wear clothing, footgear, and food. These jobs went out of country and never asked for a bailout Get off the old 1940s stuff.Every small town worker deserves more they have lived on easy street to long. Go to Florida to the retirement communities and see. Do chapter 11 get over it.At least you will have job job.If this goes thru like it looks I will vote others in and they should be looking also.


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

 

     



   





Flatbed trucking, flatbed shipping, flatbed carriers



Aerospace

Boeing Maintains 2Q Deliveries

Economics, Not Age Determine Aircraft Life

GE, USM Partner For Research Project


Pharmaceuticals/Biotech

Johnson & Johnson Buys Elan Stake For $1B

FDA Panel Wants Smaller Doses Of Painkillers

FDA Prepares To Vote On Painkiller Restrictions

Food/Beverage

Union Workers Approve Smithfield Foods Contract

Diageo To Cut 900 Jobs, Close Distillery

AB InBev Selling 4 Plants To Ball Corp.
News Video