MnetTV          Digital Library

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net


Resources
Association Links
Bookstore
Career Center
Digital Library
Events Calendar
What’s New
White Papers


News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
People in the News

MNet Career Center

Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive/Transportation
Chemical/Petroleum
Food/Beverage
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals/Biotech
Plastics/Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Electrical & Electronics
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Amazon

About Us
Editorial Contacts
Advertise with Us

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week



Obama Wants Domestic Spending Freeze
By Andrew Taylor, Associated Press Writer
Manufacturing.Net - November 13, 2009

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Obama administration has alerted domestic agencies to plan for a freeze or even a 5 percent cut in their budgets, part of an election-year push to rein in record deficits that threaten the U.S. economy and Democrats' political prospects next November.

China, the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasury securities, has expressed concern about the size of U.S. deficits. U.S. policymakers worry that alarm over deficits could push foreigners into cutting back on their purchases of Treasury debt. President Barack Obama will visit China as part of his current tour of Asia.

White House budget director Peter Orszag said Friday that it is imperative to start curbing the flow of red ink in coming years so as not to erode the fledgling economic recovery and raise interest rates. But he called it a balancing act and said acting too fast could undercut the recovery.

Orszag would not comment on the specifics of the upcoming budget, which will be unveiled in February, right after Obama's State on the Union address in which the initiative is sure to be a major focus.

Democratic officials in the White House and in Congress Hill say options for locking in budget savings include caps on the amount of money Congress gets to distribute each year for agency operating budgets. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to frankly discuss internal deliberations.

"As part of that fiscal 2011 budget, we will be putting forward proposals that will put us back on a fiscally sustainable path and that have lower deficits," Orszag said in a recent Associated Press interview. "I'm not going to get into the mix between spending and revenues. Obviously deficit reduction requires some combination of those two."

On Thursday, the government reported that the federal deficit hit a record for October as the new budget year began. The Treasury Department said the deficit for October totaled $176.4 billion, even higher than the $150 billion imbalance that economists expected. The deficit for the 2009 budget year, which ended on Sept. 30, set an all-time record in dollar terms of $1.42 trillion. That was $958 billion above the 2008 deficit, the previous record holder.

The budget freeze was planned before Democratic setbacks in last week's elections. But the bad results for Democrats -- independent voters that were central to Obama's winning coalition last year voted roughly 3 to 1 for Republican gubernatorial candidates in the states of Virginia and New Jersey -- appear to have added urgency to the deficit-cutting drive.

Independents, pollsters say, tend to be more concerned about the deficit than other voters and getting them back in the Democratic column is crucial to the party' chances in 2010 congressional elections.

The mandate to domestic agencies to limit their budget requests for the 2011 budget year comes as an economic advisory board chaired by Paul Volcker is debating ways to reform the tax code. Virtually all budget experts say there will have to be revenue increases to make any significant dent in the deficit.

The White House edict to agencies to submit spending plans at least freezing their budgets is but one round in internal administration deliberations on the budget. Cabinet heads are sure to seek exemptions, and Orszag warned that firm budget decisions have not been made.

Given Democrat's poor poll number on the deficit, cutting it may be a case in which the adage that good policy is good politics holds true.

Still, politicians have typically avoided politically painful deficit-cutting steps in election years and recent history has not been kind to politician who have tackled the issue.

Tax-raising deficit deals in 1990 and 1993 had big political consequences for President George H.W. Bush, who lost his re-election bid, and for President Bill Clinton, whose party lost control of Congress the following year.


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 33 User Comments
Add a Comment
democrat domestic spending freeze?  11/13/2009 10:50:00 AM
that's right up there with "government efficiency" isn't it?
spending freeze should include..  11/13/2009 2:15:00 PM
a freeze on foreign aid packages
So.... cancel the rest of the Porkulus?  11/13/2009 4:24:00 PM
That would be real spending reform. Also, I bet they are not touching the largest social welfare programs like Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid, which run on autopilot. More lies from the Obamites.
The truth is...  11/13/2009 4:27:00 PM
This freeze rhetoric is obviously motivated by the recent election blow-outs. I believe this freeze about as much as I believe that the stimulus spending has saved jobs (NOT AT ALL!!!) Be mindful that the definition of truth to a Marxist is "a spinning of details to promote their Marxist agenda". It has nothing at all to do with presenting facts.
5 WHOLE %!!!!  11/13/2009 4:38:00 PM
WOWIE!!!! Too bad you didn't put that freeze in place BEFORE you dumped $700BB into the toilet called the bank, insurance and stock market loosers. I might have been more impressed. I say "might" because you will NEVER do anything to impress me Mr. Obama. You can't even give a speech to grieving soldiers in Ft. Hood without a speech writer and teleprompter. Talk about "from the heart". Rhetoric is just that.
spending freeze  11/13/2009 4:39:00 PM
Bill Clinton (a Democrat)produced balanced budgets and handed over a surplus to George Bush (a Republican)who ran up huge deficits. The Republicans simply have no credibility on this issue.
Wages  11/13/2009 4:40:00 PM
Does this include freezing Government wages
Ludicrous  11/13/2009 4:48:00 PM
$1T deficit increase year on year in 2009 plus $1T increase for health care bill plus cap and trade GDP losses. The Heritage Foundation analysis of Waxman-Markey found that implementing the bill would reduce aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) by $9.4 trillion from 2012-2035. That translates into lower tax revenues to Uncle Sam. So a 5% budget cut is the politically painful step to reduce deficits? We are led by fools and charlatans.
re: spending freeze  11/13/2009 4:52:00 PM
Bush's huge deficits alienated most Republicans and independents so no one is claiming credibility. Even so, his deficits were miniscule compared to Obama's.
Domestic vs foreign debt  11/13/2009 4:53:00 PM
The Classic remedy for recession is to increase the domestic debt, which puts unused money into the economy to spur growth. But at the end of the Bush Administration, the average citizen is in debt. Government cannot borrow domestically, so has to use foreign debt, which has long term consequences. Since the average citizen has spent himself poor by the end of the Bush administration, there are only 2 possible choices: end recession using foreign debt or let recession continue. There are no other fiscal alternatives - except to print money, which devaluates the dollar. You simply cannot spend money like the past 8 years and not pay the price now. Look at Germany after WW1. The Treaty of Versailles placed such a burden of foreign debt that enabled radical elements to grab power. We have hard choices to make.
So Obama is canceling...  11/13/2009 4:56:00 PM
Socialized Medicine Bills in the House and Senate (Obama Care), giving back the remaining $772B in Porkulous, ending Acorn funding, sell GM and Crapalizer, bank bail-outs, Wall Street bail-outs, TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program), TALF (Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility), PPIP(Public-Private Investment Program), green energy subsidies, $275B in mortgage rescue, and on and on and on and on...
Spending Freeze response  11/13/2009 5:07:00 PM
Obama, a Democrat, in 8 months increased the deficit up to what it took George Bush 8 years to spend and Obama's not even close to being done yet. And by the way, Mr. Clinton's so called budget balancing came by borrowing from Social Security. I would agree, Bush spent more than I would like to see a responsible Republican spend but to infer that the Democrats have more spending responsibility than the Republicans is a pretty far fetched idea.
Spending freeze  11/13/2009 5:14:00 PM
Bill Clinton (a Marxist and member of the Bilderberg Group) did not produce a balanced budget due to his own actions. Clinton capitalized on the peace dividend created by Reagan resulting from the end of the Cold War. George Bush fell prey to out of control spending of the Democrat (Marxist) Congressional spending and of course the stupid war in Iraq.
Fools and Charlatans  11/13/2009 5:42:00 PM
If you want to find fools and charlatans, all you have to do is to look at the Heritage Foundation. Bank bailout, started with Bush, and Stimulus, which France, Germany, Japan and China all did, were necessary to bring the world economy back from the brink of collapse. Now that recession has officially ended, which country will do well and which won't depend mostly on how competitive their manufacturing is, and America is not the favored winner.
deficit  11/13/2009 5:55:00 PM
The 1.4t 2008-2009 deficit is primarily Bush's budget. That was started in Sep 08, when Bush was still president. Obama added about 220b of stimulus - the 700b stimulus is over 3 years. Recall that the last time we had a surplus was under a Dem administration. But then Bush raised spending ($1t in Iraq for example) and cut taxes. Not surprisingly this led to a large deficit. Obama has a difficult task to reduce this deficit. We will see.
Obama is a lying fool  11/13/2009 6:41:00 PM
...and a dumba$$. He and congress need to cut 10% or more, stop the porkulous, freeze all foreign aid, and stop the bailouts. Let companies fail if they must. Let's swallow the bitter pill now, rather than let this mess keep growing out of control. Less gov't = better gov't.
Re: Ludicrous and Re: re: spending freeze  11/13/2009 6:51:00 PM
Amen. Amen. Though Bush did way too much red ink spending when he was tied to a Democratic congress, his over spending was a drop in the bucket compared to the Obama/Democratic controlled government in the past 10 1/2 months. They just took advantage of the financial scare to socialize this country in a matter of months, that otherwise may have taken decades or would have never happened with the election cycles changing government control on a regular cycle. With the current changes by the present government control we will likely be running over a $2-3 trillion yearly deficit for the forseeable future, unless our elected officials or next years election changes some thinking in Washington. God help us all. We better all learn Chinese, once they own us lock stock and barrel. In any case the Chinese have sucked us in to be their slaves paying our debt to them to support their Communist government. Has the USA sold it's soul.
Patience please... the government is doing its best.  11/13/2009 8:21:00 PM
Listen all you unemployed angry people, the government is doing its best to help the world economy. They are putting in place a major health care bill, taking care of the Global econonmy, helping China, Russia, other countries that need our fund. We are the engine of hope for the world. With our middle classes wealth in property, saving and retirement funds, those funds can be used to help the world. We have had it too good, there are other parts in the world that are without running water, clean food, we can share the wealth, the government is going to help you see the way to wealth redistribution. You voted for hope and change, the hope for the world. This is America's new vision to spread the wealth man. You got to do your part is it your patriotic duty man. This commercial break is sponsored by ACORN and SUEI of America, and OBwon Konobama.
Blame Bush for peoples debt??  11/14/2009 12:54:00 PM
How can any one blame George Bush for debt of the citizens. People make their own choices. Not veryone can afford a $250,00.00 home and 2 $50,000.00 dollar cars. I do not trust any polition. There are some better than others but individules should know what they can afford and what they cant. I would love to live beyond my means but I am smarter than that. All government officals should have to take a 10% cut in pay!! No more parties and frre trips on the tax payers check books!!!
Bush-Bush-Bush!!!!!!!!!!!!!  11/14/2009 3:47:00 PM
You Obamorons can't stop looking in the rear-view mirror. The current idiot has been in office for a year and has done far, far more harm than was done in the prior eight. This is his dismal ecenomy - he made it worsr - he owns it.
Good Morning Obama  11/16/2009 7:16:00 AM
He finally woke up out of his deep slumber. Are you ready to stay up and keep us (and my great grand children out of debt)? Put away your Batman PJ's and run this country properly!!!
Obama Wants Domestic Spending Freeze  11/16/2009 8:54:00 AM
It is absurb that our congressmen (both parties) are more interested in good politics than what is good for the USA.
Re: Patience please  11/16/2009 10:42:00 AM
I am not sure I want to be part of the "engine of hope for the world." The world economy is too big for it to be any more than a major player. I can't see where US wealth redistribution will do any more than send us to the poor house. In case you haven't looked, most of the wealth that is being created today is being created in China. China believes in wealth redistribution. You should be sending your message to them.
Too many morons listening to Limbaugh  11/16/2009 10:59:00 AM
Bank failures inherited from Bush needed bailout to prevent collapse. Other nations in the world had done the same thing because it was absolutely necessary or the economies collapse. Same with Stimulus. Obama did exactly what the economics text books call for, to end recession by stimulus, also done by Germany, China, France, Japan, successfully. Recession has ended, world wide. Obama also managed to save the auto industry jobs that were heading into oblivion otherwise, and that would have made the recession into a depression. Please, stop listening to Limbaugh and get some education. Ignorance is not bliss. Ignorance will destroy our nation and the world with it.
Most certainly Bush was responsible  11/16/2009 11:40:00 AM
If there is a bad traffic light, and cars run into each other, whose fault is it? Bush should regulate the banking and mortgage industry so that banks do not make deceptively affordable balloon loans at high profits and high commissions for overvalued houses to underfunded buyers. Predatory loan practices were the cause and allowing banks to do that was completely irresponsible. Just like the stock market. What if there was no law against Insider Trading? Tens of millions of people would have gotten robbed. It would be just like running a city without a police force.
Re: Spending Freeze and Deficit  11/16/2009 2:01:00 PM
Anyone remember that the old Repubs controlled the Congress when Clinton left office? Clinton admitted that he straight out lied about part of the surplus and much of the rest was uncommitted airport and interstate highway funds. Look, look, see the surplus vanish!! The 2009 budget deficit Bush's? Remember that this was a Democtrat budget that BHO decided that he would not challenge. This selective memory loss gets members of the Socialist Democratic Party confused. Some Repubs want to cross the aisle and make nice.Gag!!!
Cut First Lady Staff?  11/16/2009 6:10:00 PM
What about BHO and the unelected first lady cutting her staff of lads a leaping and maids a milking?
There's Plenty of Blame to Go Around!  11/16/2009 9:59:00 PM
As long as we are finger pointing, let us remember that the country hasn't really had leadership for about sixteen years! Bush only got elected because the opposition was so lame! President Obama was elected for pretty much the same reason, and many of us voted for him BECAUSE he promised CHANGE. Well, we got our change all right, but it was in the wrong direction! And just for the record, the Iraq fiasco has yet to rerach a trillion dollars in financial cost. The porkulous however has topped a trillion, what with Bush's unfettered give away via Paulison of about $800Billion, followed us with President Obama's $700 billion give away which was a bit wider spread, but still given without much forethought. Cut domestic spending 5%? This isn't even a token amount! Remember that our esteemed House and Senate members just voted themselves raises averaging $10,000! They are already far, far overcompensated, even without the "perks" (graft) most of them take in! They only work part time at best. Folks, a standard work schedule is 2,080 hours per year, including paid holidays and earned vacation. If you actually work, and truly represent the people of your various districts fairly, then you are truly unusual! But you still don't deserve the kind of salary you're drawing. And speaking of pouring taxpayer's money down a rat hole...what is it costing us financially to keep the President flying all over the world in princely fashion? I would suggest that many billions have been spent on that already! We don't really know of course, because executive branch security details of any kind are top secret. I'll concede that this is probably necessary, but it is really sending the wrong message to folks both at home and abroad. Stay at home in the White House, Mr. President, and put all of your mental prowess into addressing the vast wastefulness of our government in general, and the so-called entitlement programs in particular. And by the way, I'm not talking about social Security and Medicare, as all working Americans (except Government workers)and their employers "contribute" to it all of their working lives, at least until they reach a rather large earned income level each year. (Used to be anyone with a reasonable income would "top out" their contribution part way through the year, but not any more! I'll get off my soap box now, and try to avoid the rising tide of red ink coming from Washington!
Although no one really mentioned it,  11/17/2009 12:42:00 PM
I'm sure we can find something in all of this to blame the FOX network.
Clinton capitalized on the peace dividend created by Reagan   11/20/2009 8:36:00 AM
Reagan did this? You are to be kidding me. Reagan did not do anything. This Cowboy was our worst President ever.
Budget Freeze/Reduction?  11/20/2009 9:39:00 AM
1. Immediate across the board salary reductions to a normal sustainable level. 2. Return some vital manufacturing back to USA. 3. High level punitive taxes to non-compliance exaggerated salaries ($100,000+)in all sectors i.e sports, media, arts, law, corporate, education, construction, government, etc... 4. Reward companies and investors that infuse profits back into their companies or economy (creating new jobs, investing in advance technologies, etc...). Note: Progress is good but not if it will destroy this nation. Lead by example and others will follow.
Change you can believe in ...  11/20/2009 4:42:00 PM
I guess it's time to scrap that motto now, Obama zig-zags around the World and so do his policies ... so far other then some cheap public speeches, even cheaper anounchments he did not mange to deliver onto (close Guantanamo), embracing W's attacks on civil liberties ("patriot law" , he really is a Socialist in the sense of view of GOPies' delivering less then zero. progressives are fed up too - so be happy GOP you will have chance to send another comander like W into the W H soon - sorry for the US - countryu will go down the drain with more of the same failed policies of conservatism - sleep well America!
RE: Change you can believe in...  11/20/2009 7:03:00 PM
GW Bush was not a conservative. He tried too much to "be a uniter" and reached across the aisle to the socialist Democrats way too many times. Democrats have proven over and over that the more you reach out to them, the more they kick you in the teeth. Unfortunately, the Democrats think that a 52% victory gives them a mandate to ramrod their socialist policies down the throats of the "hope and change" voters. These are policies that the leftists have only dreamt of for the past several decades. This is going to result in a backlash when they are voted out of office in 2010. The net result is a deepening divide in the culture war. We may be moving towards a red state/blue state civil war if cooler heads cannot prevail. We are certainly moving towards bankruptcy if conservative fiscal policy is not adopted, and soon. Sorry you're not happy with your Democrats, but don't blame conservatives when they have to pay off these insane Obama debts eventually. Party on Democrats, but the pain is coming with certainty.


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

 

     



   





Flatbed trucking, flatbed shipping, flatbed carriers



Metals

Rio Tinto Sells Ghana Bauxite Stake To Chinese Firm

Cadmium Found In Adult Jewelry

Alcoa Realigns Business Units, Adds COOs


Automotive/Transportation

Toyota To Recall 50,000 Prius Hybrids In Europe

State Farm Warned Of Toyota Problem In 2007

Investigators Say Not All Toyota Problems Resolved

Pharmaceuticals/Biotech

Bristol-Myers Squibb Freezing Salaries

Former Bristol-Myers Worker Charged With Trade Theft

GlaxoSmithKline Profit Rises 66 Percent
News Video