MnetTV          Digital Library

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net
Today in Manufacturing.Net

Resources
Association Links
Bookstore
Digital Library
Events Calendar
Job Search
What’s New
White Papers

Browse White Papers


News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
People in the News

Job Search


Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive/Transportation
Chemical/Petroleum
Food/Beverage
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals/Biotech
Plastics/Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Electrical & Electronics
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Amazon

About Us
Editorial Contacts
Advertise with Us

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week



 


Mnet house ad 120x240



Michigan Wins Battle For GM Small Car Plant
By David N. Goodman, Associated Press Writer
Manufacturing.Net - June 26, 2009

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague


ORION TOWNSHIP, Mich. (AP) -- Michigan has snatched back a few of its fast-disappearing auto jobs, winning a high-stakes competition with two other states to build General Motors Corp.'s next-generation subcompact car.

The news is a bright spot in an otherwise gloomy Michigan economy that has seen unemployment hit a nation-leading 14.1 percent, lots of housing foreclosures, unpaid furlough days for state workers and uncertainty for thousands of others worried about whether they'll still be getting a paycheck in the months ahead.

"We're delighted," Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson said Thursday after a person briefed on the decision told The Associated Press that GM would keep 1,200 jobs at the retooled midsize car factory in Orion Township, about 40 miles north of Detroit.

U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., confirmed Friday that GM chose the Michigan plant. The automaker also had considered plants in Janesville, Wis., and Spring Hill, Tenn.

A spokesman for Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle said GM Manufacturing Vice President Tim Lee told the governor Friday morning that the automaker chose Michigan.

"I am deeply disappointed by GM's decision not to reopen the Janesville plant," Doyle said in a written statement. "Because GM in recent bankruptcy proceedings announced closing seven plants in Michigan and the Orion plant was in current operation, we knew it would be an uphill battle."

GM declined to comment on the decision but spokesman Tom Wilkinson said the automaker planned to make an announcement Friday.

Tony Medrano, an hourly employee at the Orion Township plant, called it "awesome news." The Orion plant now makes the Pontiac G6 and Chevrolet Malibu midsize cars, but the Pontiac brand is being discontinued and the Malibu also is made at factory in Kansas City, Kan. The plant was to go on standby status later this year.

Medrano, who has worked for GM for eight years, was one of the plant workers who accompanied Democratic Michigan Rep. Gary Peters to GM's headquarters last week to deliver letters to company officials pressing for bringing small car production to the factory.

He's unsure about the future of his job because its unclear if the plant will need the same amount of workers as it has now. But he said he still wanted Orion Township to get the chance to build the 160,000 small cars annually.

"We figured the push for this vehicle was more important than our jobs," he said.

Auto workers weren't the only ones heartened by the news. Ron Basar, a 44-year-old engineer with the auto parts supplier Inteva Products, said landing the small car was "quite a relief."

His company faced shutting at least one of its plants had the Orion Township plant closed, and the township would have suffered a big blow to its finances.

"Without that tax base, it would be pretty devastating," he said. "We really need them in the area."

Michigan has lost nearly half its manufacturing jobs since they hit a peak in mid-2000, or more than 450,000 positions. At least half a million workers already are collecting unemployment benefits in the state. So holding onto at least some of the GM jobs it thought it was losing is a major victory.

GM is likely to announce that its Pontiac parts stamping plant will be retooled to make parts for the new car, based on the Chevrolet Spark. About 1,000 jobs could be saved there, more good news for Oakland County.

"We had stiff competition from Tennessee and Wisconsin," Patterson said. "I think the impact of reopening that plant and making the small car here will have a huge long-term effect not just on Oakland County but southeast Michigan and help us address some of the real serious employment issues that we have in this region."

Michigan's win meant a loss for workers hoping GM would reopen the Janesville plant or spare the Spring Hill plant where 2,500 workers will lose their jobs later this year when production of the Chevrolet Traverse crossover vehicle moves to a plant near Lansing.

"I am going to remain optimistic," said Cliff Goff, 53, a longtime employee at Spring Hill who has worked for GM since 1975. "I am a person who believes you have got a great work force. You have a great plant. ... I would think they understand they have a valuable asset there."

Goff said in a telephone interview that a "decision to do nothing with that plant would have a serious impact on our workers and our community."

Michigan, Wisconsin and Tennessee all offered incentive packages to GM in an effort to lure the plant. Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen said Thursday that his state's incentive bid was "nothing like" what GM had originally sought.

But Michigan, facing the effects of Chapter 11 bankruptcies at GM and Chrysler LLC and the crumbling of its once-proud car culture, pulled out all the stops to win the plant.

"Clearly we have been creative in fighting for the small car plant," said Liz Boyd, spokeswoman for Democratic Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm. "We have a history of going after manufacturing projects and supporting the American automobile industry with incentives."

She declined to give specifics of Michigan's offer. But the state has revamped its business tax to give manufacturers more breaks and has already handed out millions of dollars in tax breaks to the auto industry.

Michigan's congressional delegation also lobbied heavily to bring the small car to the state. All 17 members sent a letter to GM last week saying that the state's economic woes made the project important for Michigan. Peters had begun a "Make it in Michigan!" campaign that collected over 28,000 signatures.

Michigan got more good news Friday, when General Electric Co. said it will open a manufacturing technology center in southeast Michigan, where the May unemployment rate was 14.9 percent.

Still, Michigan is far from being out of the woods. Michigan likely will see its jobless rate increase dramatically when GM closes or idles five plants in the state by the end of 2010, including a truck assembly plant in Pontiac a short distance from the Orion Township factory.

But landing the small car did put a note of optimism in the hot summer air.

"I knew that we had been battered for a while, but I never had any doubt that we'd come back," Patterson said.

Kathy Barks Hoffman reported from Lansing, Mich. Associated Press Writers Tom Krisher and Kimberly S. Johnson in Detroit, Jim Irwin in Birmingham, Mich., Bill Poovey in Chatanooga, Tenn., Todd Richmond in Madison, Wis., Erik Schelzig in Nashville, Tenn., Dan Strumpf in New York and Ken Thomas in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 14 User Comments
Add a Comment
Michigan  6/26/2009 11:51:00 AM
Wonder how much money Michigan paid GM in incentives! It just always goes to the highest bidder...
How Much Did It Cost  6/26/2009 11:57:00 AM
In earlier stories about this "competition" one of the states said GM wanted 10's of millions of dollars to locate the new plant in their state. How much money did Michigan have to give GM to get this deal. I will never buy another GM product as long as I live! The taxpayers of this country bailed them out and now the Michigan taxpayers, most of whom are now unemployed have to pay again. Better they should have gone under. My wallet is weary from keeping them afloat!!
Yeah, I Bet  6/26/2009 12:00:00 PM
You can rest assured that the millions in cash GM was trying to extort from the different states was definitely paid by Michigan. After all, the Michigan delegation long ago lost any integrity they ever had.
Better here in MI than TN!  6/26/2009 12:02:00 PM
People outside the midwest don't even buy domestic cars. Go to TN and all you see are KIA's, Hyundai's, Toyotas, etc
YEP! Michigan's Money goes to GM!  6/26/2009 12:44:00 PM
Money goes to GM and 61% is owned by.....the government. Of course, you always thought that meant "the people". SILLY! It will go into some fat-cat congressman/woman's pocket. Whose calling the shots? OBAMA! DUH!
MI domestics  6/26/2009 1:08:00 PM
People in all areas of the country buy domestics. Tn has a high percentage of Nissan and soon VW because they are made here. We are Americans and we support Americans!
When were you in TN  6/26/2009 1:27:00 PM
To the comment titled "Better here in MI than TN", I have bought my last bailed out vehicle. I currently drive a Jeep Wrangler and am a TN based electronics manufacturer who prefers to source parts from the US. The decision by GM was purely political payback. Our Governor wasn't about to write a check to keep Spring Hill open. A previous governor helped GM build it, the current I believed help remodel it. A local dealership (50+ year old business) just closed because they sold Pontiac and Jeep products along with GMC trucks. Another local dealership that still exists sells KIAs and lost their Chrysler franchise. Tennessee is being punished by the current administration for not voting his way in the last election and having conservative leadership that is not falling for the untenable business model of Michigan Auto Makers. By the way, Nissan just announced expansion plans in TN 50 miles from Spring Hill, and VW is moving dirt in Chattanooga. My next truck will be a Ford because they have had the integrity to fight through their problems without US Government help. I'll be looking at VWs and Nissans when I look for a new car, at least some of the money will stay in TN. If you dislike TN so much, drive around it when you're headed to the beach from MI next time. That way we won't have to smell the smoke from your Dodge Caravan.
MI Domestics  6/26/2009 2:12:00 PM
We have Nissan and Toyota operations here in MI as well but these FOREIGN cars are made with a much higher content of FOREIGN parts than GM, Ford or Chrysler, and the biggest profit margin of the whole car manufacturing operation is in assembly and those profits go over seas for Toyota and Nissan where they are invested in FOREIGN countries. This buy American thing needs to become the cultural norm before it will have any effect in government and corporate America. It seems that people outside of MI just don't get it.
Re:Better here  6/26/2009 2:53:00 PM
People in TN don't "all" buy imported cars, although there is a large class of Yuppie Democrats that do. But this is the scourge of any diverse city. Most often seen vehicle on the roads around middle TN is a Ford pickup. They know the weakly constructed Toyota "me too" pickup really is a TOYota. I live in TN, and am a very remorseful Republican who voted for CHANGE! But I would never change to the point of buying an imported car...like a number of GM's cars are, and Chrysler's will be. You have to be careful what you buy in order to buy American. You also need to do a bit of research before dissing something you so obviously know nothing about! Personally, I think the TN Gov was remiss in even trying to play their crooked game, and should have known in advance that Government Motors would not go for a right to work state.
Re: MI Domestics  6/26/2009 4:23:00 PM
If one definition of a foreign car is that it's made here but the profits go to a foreign country, then isn't Chrysler a foreign car company now? And what about when Fiat opens a plant here? What is the UAW going to say about having its members possibly building foreign cars? Or is it OK to buy a foreign car as long it's built by a UAW member? Someone needs to explain the rules-I keep getting confused.
Re: MI Domestics  6/27/2009 9:16:00 AM
The UAW has destroyed what it could of the US auto industry. Now the federal government is poised to finish it off. I am as "Buy American" as you get, but Detroit doesn't have much in common with the work ethic in TN. The welfare state that the UAW has created for the "worker" and that the government has created for the "non-worker" has endangered our way of life. When are we going to learn as a people that the only sustainable business model is one where more value is created than is expended.
What Wisconsin Governor REALLY said  6/27/2009 10:45:00 AM
Here is what the Governor of Wisconsin really said about GM as quoted from the Milwaukee Journal Online:After hearing from GM on Friday, Gov. Jim Doyle issued a statement saying he was "deeply disappointed" that GM hadn't chosen "a very strong package" offered by the City of Janesville, Rock County and the state. "I do not believe that Michigan matched us," Doyle said. "I certainly hope that we were not used to simply leverage more resources from Michigan."
Union Problems Unresolved  6/28/2009 3:11:00 AM
Building small cars with union labor contracts is untenable. Why waste the time proving that it is. I'm buying foreign nameplates from now on. I am tired of supporting over-paid, belligerent prima donnas. Fix the union problem by giving them a pay and benefits package like Toyotas', or shut GM and Chrysler down!
Re: Union Problems Unresolved  6/29/2009 11:16:00 AM
Evidently you have no idea what Toyota workers are paid. The only real difference is that the Big 3 have been building cars for 100 years and have a large retiree group that have pensions and benefits. Wait until these places have 20 or 30 thousand retirees to take care of and see how the bottom line looks then.


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

 

     



   





Flatbed trucking, flatbed shipping, flatbed carriers



Food/Beverage

Tyson Foods Must Pay $250K In Labor Suit

Candy Maker Cutting 175 Jobs In Minnesota

Snack Makers Utz, Snyder Nix Merger Plan


Plastics/Rubber

EPA To Set Standards For PVC Plant Emissions

Goodyear’s 3Q Profit More Than Doubles

Bridgestone Closing Australia, NZ Tire Plants

Automotive/Transportation

Mercedes-Benz Sales Up 4 Percent

Alabama Benefits From Georgia's Kia Plant

Prius Continues To Be Top-Selling Car In Japan
News Video