Loading...

 

 
Loading...

    

   
               MnetTV          

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net
Loading...


Resources
About Us
Advertise With Us
Association Links
Audio
Blogs
Bookstore
Career Center
Editorial Contacts
Events Calendar
Videos
What’s New
White Papers

News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Gulf Oil Spill Coverage
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
New Products
Offbeat News
People in the News

Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive & Transportation
Chemical & Petroleum
Electrical & Electronics
Food & Beverage
Heavy Machinery
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals & Biotech
Plastics & Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

FDA Pushes Drugmakers To Curb Painkiller Abuse
By Matthew Perrone, AP Business Writer
Manufacturing.Net - December 04, 2009

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague
Loading...

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Pharmaceutical executives laid out plans Friday to prevent the misuse of prescription painkillers, under pressure from regulators trying to stop hundreds of fatal overdoses each year.

But Food and Drug Administration officials said industry's proposals were short on specifics and that more work is needed before any measures are put in place.

Johnson & Johnson, King Pharmaceuticals and other drugmakers proposed using patient medication guides, letters to doctors and additional physician training to curb inappropriate use and prescribing of painkillers.

The FDA sent letters to 16 companies in February ordering them to design so-called risk management plans for their drugs. The drugmakers are presenting their joint proposal to the agency after several months of discussion.

The companies at Friday's meeting produce 24 opioid drugs -- including morphine, oxycodone and methadone -- which are often abused for their euphoric effect.

The FDA has required risk management plans for individual drugs before, but never for an entire class of drugs.

Industry consultant Sidney Schnoll said the requirement is "unprecedented in the history of pharmaceutical medicine and in the history of the FDA." Risk management plans can include: safety labeling, educational campaigns and even certification requirements for physicians.

Schnoll and others warned that mandatory certification standards could cause some physicians to stop prescribing the medications altogether, limiting access to patients.

"The bottom line here is that the 'risk management plans' should not impede important medication from reaching appropriate patients," said Schnoll, a paid consultant for the companies with Pinney Associates.

In place of mandatory certification, the drug industry said the federal Drug Enforcement Administration could offer voluntary training to prescribers. However, executives acknowledged that congressional action would be needed to allow the DEA to provide such training. Currently, the agency's mission is to enforce laws governing highly addictive medications.

FDA leaders expressed concern that a key component of the companies' plan relies on congressional action.

"Congress can act very quickly sometimes and very slowly other times," said Dr. John Jenkins, FDA's director of new drugs. "And sometimes they don't act at all."

Other FDA officials said they wanted to hear more specifics from the drugmakers.

No matter what form they take, the final risk management plans won't be in place anytime soon. FDA officials said they want to hold another public meeting in the spring to gather more input before finalizing the requirements.

The products targeted by the FDA, which come in both pill and patch forms, generally feature extended-release formulas designed to give long-lasting effects. But that potency carries serious risks when patients abuse them as stimulants.

The FDA has issued a number of warnings on prescription pain relievers in recent years but with little success. A federal survey conducted in 2007 found 5.2 million people in the U.S. reported using prescription pain drugs inappropriately.

Companies attending the meeting include makers of generic pills as well as brand-name products, like Johnson & Johnson's Duragesic patch, King Pharmaceuticals' extended-releases Avinza and Embeda pills, and Purdue Pharma's extended-release OxyContin.

There are other problems with opioids besides deliberate abuse.

The FDA has documented many cases of physicians prescribing the potent painkillers for patients with migraine headaches, an unapproved use. The FDA said patients also sometimes chew extended-release pills that are designed to be swallowed, causing an overdose of the drug.


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 15 User Comments
Add a Comment
how is this going to be effective?  12/4/2009 12:47:00 PM
If people are going to abuse a substance they are going to do it and the manufacturer can't stop them or be held liable for the abuse. These people are adults and if they choose to do something stupid they have nobody to blame but themselves.
Perscriptions  12/4/2009 2:03:00 PM
If there are tighter controls for doctors and more stringent policing of them doesn't that also mean that fewer perscriptions will be written even if for a valid reason due to the hassels involved and problems with abuse.
Solution!  12/4/2009 4:20:00 PM
Make the pills so big with inert ingredients they can't be swallowed by humans. Or they could all be made suppositiories and fewer would be used for euphoric effects.
Prescriptions  12/4/2009 4:33:00 PM
My wife has been prescription pain killers since her lower back operation, which did not relieve her original pain. Right now she has to jump through hoops and humiliation each time she goes to her pain management clinic. She has to undergo urine tests to prove she uses the medication and is not selling them. Get to the doctors who are prescribing them without legitimate medical reasons.
Re: Solution!  12/4/2009 4:47:00 PM
Love the response - when are folks going to realize if someone wants to abuse something, be it drugs, not wearing seat belts, etc.- you cannot legislate a cure. Think that falls into the "survial of the fittest" thing.
Painkiller abuse  12/4/2009 4:53:00 PM
Every time the rules change it usually has the most negative affect to those who need them the most to live a normal life and the Doctors who prescribe them. I already have to schedule things like vacation and family events around refill times and I can't travel away from home for more than 30 days. We should know that trying to legislate behavior has never worked and never will. There is a lot to be said for natural selection if we would leave it alone long enough to work.
This does not make sense  12/4/2009 4:55:00 PM
I would expect the patients doctor to make the risk management decision with the patient since they are familiar with the circumstances as they relate to that individual-inlcuding the potential for abuse. This is not the manufacturers responsibility. There is no one answer applicable for all patients, especially when it comes to the potential for abuse. What is the FDA thinking? If they have cases about doctors perscribing the wrong drugs or for the wrong reasons they (the FDA) should require something of those doctors (more training?), not the drug manufacutrers. Sounds like the FDA is looking for the easiest answer, fo after the relatively few manufacturers, not all the doctors.
Pain killers  12/4/2009 4:58:00 PM
I have chronic pain. I have no abuse history. I sit in waiting rooms full of people who need these drugs for pain relief. Drs are afraid to prescribe these when they are needed as it is. Many times the pain killers are a better choice that surgery
gobermint always knows best  12/4/2009 10:21:00 PM
4:53:00 PM says enough. Like this person I cannot make it through a day without lying down and writhing in pain for a while. If I wasn't the boss I'd be out of work for not being able to function enough to stay productive. I don't like taking the stuff as it is very toxic. The toxicity is from the additives of Tylenol/Ibuprofen crap that do nothing to relieve pain. The best part of all of this is to have to periodically crawl to the doctor that will even prescribe. They know that some government maggot will scrutinize everything that they do and then hand it off to some filthy federal attorney that wants to make a name for himself so that he can have a reputation as a drug busting tough guy on his way to higher levels in the prosecution rackets, and perhaps a sinecure as a Federal Judge where over 97% of those charged are convicted. No, I do not like the limited buzz. I'd rather have some relief that lasts thorough my previous working day of eleven hours, now down to six or seven hours at most. The government is hell bent on making all of us of any station and situation below themselves and their pets in banking have to grovel. If I have to do any more begging from them I will just shut down my manufacturing and leave this utterly corrupt country. Of course I could start a regimen of the correct drugs that they push. They cost seventy-eight times more and will kill my immune system, but hey, that's what is the price to pay to be on the right side of goomint and the DEA.
Adding my 2 cents worth...  12/4/2009 11:43:00 PM
and I might add, that's probably about the government will think all of our thoughts are worth! To me, this is another "big brother" plan to further invade the privacy of the average person. A person's personal doctor, be it a specialist or a primary care physician, should know the patient's case well enough to make drug decisions that make the most sense for each patient. Hacving lived long enough to reach "old goat" status, I've known a few surgical procedures in my live, and have needed theraputic doses of pain control drugs. In hospital, they had lots of chance to experiment and find the best drugs, because in middle age I produced kidney stones like mad. Morphine turned out to be the drug of choice, worked beautifully, and I got lots of sleep! Never felt any kind of craving, as when the drug was no longer necessary, it was stopped. Also tore out a rotator cuff during a misadventure at the plant, and ended up with a massive infection, which had to be treated before repairs could be considered. So, I laid in my hospital room, and was treated with antibiotics for the staph and you guessed it...morphine for the pain. When I finished with the surgery, they sent me home with some really potent pills called mepergan (I think) I had to write down the time when I took them so I didn't OD! Very potent, and given only in small numbers. In all, the moral (if there is one) of this story is that there perhaps millions of people that NEED these medications for short or even extended times. Those needing them tend to self regulate their use to the minimum needed, because they could run out prematurely and not have the needed relief. The FDA may need....does need to police the purity and efficacy of drugs on the market, but have no place digging into the lives of truly law abiding persons who have to deal with REAL pain in their lives, by causing them another pain...in the butt!
draconian drug regulation  12/5/2009 5:32:00 PM
As someone with chronic pain who requires these meds in order to maintain the degree of functionality I need to to make a living as well as to be able to pay the outrageous costs of over regulated medicines and an under regulated insurance industry, it is my perspective that this is nothing more than thinly veiled government excesses and a way to focus on things other than the real problem. While I laud efforts that make it harder for people who think that they want to die from taking premature steps, I think that perhaps too high of a price is being paid already when I have to prove to the government that I am using the pills by peeing in a bottle on demand and that I cannot travel too far from my physician and his prescription pad. These pills are the difference between my functioning and being a productive tax paying member of society and my being debiiitated from my pain to the point where I can not function well enough to work. Quite treating me like a criminal because you want to stop "criminal" behavior.
Re: Re: Solution!  12/5/2009 8:16:00 PM
In the end, it is the MD that makes the decisions based on his/her years of education and experience. If a patient wants to abuse drugs, he/she will find a way...an illegal one, to get the drugs. I honestly believe the greatest portion of doctors are very aware of drug effects, and opiates can be addictive if consumed when there IS no pain to fight. And, you cannot legislate common sense (and apparently we can't elect it either)and there will always be those that want to operate outside what is acceptable. Or, to put it another way, "Dumb can be cured by education. Stupid, however is permanent."
Needed education  12/7/2009 9:38:00 AM
So we are going to teach people NOT to chew their pills. Never found any that needed chewing. We are going to teach them to take one at a time as prescribed. Maybe some can't read. then we are telling them to use only one patch at a time so they won't OD. Come on these people learned how to get high, doctors and druggists didn't teach them. I guess some congress persons kid OD'd and now3 they don't want to accept any of the blame, so pass a law that shows it was someone elses fault. Once you are past the age of 18, you are now resonsible for your actions, All of them.
They have tried this before  12/7/2009 9:38:00 AM
When they are losing control of the war on illegal drugs, they restrict legal drugs so they can give the illusion of doing something. They impose oversight and restrictions on honest, law abiding doctors and patients because they won't send the illegal drug traffikers, dealers and abusers to jail. They know the threat of jail will deter the honest people, but only actual incarceration will restrict the dregs.
Drugs  12/8/2009 10:34:00 AM
I have no choice in this matter. If you don't want pain. The alternative I have done or tried and no one will pay for that type of surgery to eliminate the pain killers. It was deemed unnecessary and experimental. I have to take oral medication to function and maintain a life. What choices are they offering?


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

Loading...

 

     



  

Loading...

 


Loading...


Loading...

Most Popular News Stories of the Week
Loading...