MnetTV          Digital Library

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net
Today in Manufacturing.Net

Resources
Association Links
Bookstore
Digital Library
Events Calendar
Job Search
What’s New
White Papers

Browse White Papers


News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
People in the News

Job Search


Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive/Transportation
Chemical/Petroleum
Food/Beverage
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals/Biotech
Plastics/Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Electrical & Electronics
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Amazon

About Us
Editorial Contacts
Advertise with Us

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week



 


Mnet house ad 120x240



Canadian Meat Producers Protest U.S. Label Law

Manufacturing.Net - November 03, 2008

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague


EDMONTON, Alberta (AP) -- Beef and pork producers want the Canadian government to launch a trade challenge against the United States over a new law that requires retailers to provide country-of-origin labeling for fresh meat, saying that the regulation is shutting their livestock out of American markets.

Since the Country Of Origin Labeling (COOL) law went into effect on Oct. 1, a growing number of meat plants in the U.S. are refusing to accept Canadian cattle and hogs for processing, the Canadian Cattlemen's Association said Sunday.

Under country of origin labeling, Canadian cattle and pigs must be segregated in U.S. feedlots and packing plants, prompting some firms to only deal with American livestock. Canadian animals are also required to have more documentation about where they came from, and in the case of cattle, the animals must have tags that indicate they are free of mad cow disease.

Such measures cut into already narrow profit margins, said the cattle association.

The Canadian Pork Council said U.S. hog processing companies, such as Smithfield and Hormel, have already indicated they will no longer purchase hogs born outside of the states. Other U.S. processors have said they will only buy Canadian pigs on certain days at selected plants.

The cattlemen's association said some corporations, including Tyson, are already refusing Canadian cattle and that others such as Cargill may only slaughter Canadian cattle on certain days.

"Conditions for Canadian producers deteriorate each day," Jurgen Preugschas, president of the pork council, wrote in a letter to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper urging the federal government to take quick action.

"We are saying get it started right away because there is an opportunity when the new U.S. administration comes in for this thing to get worse. We want that shot across the bow right now to head it off," said John Masswohl of the Canadian Cattlemen's Association.

The Canadian Cattlemen's Association and the Canadian Pork Council are calling on the Canadian government to challenge the U.S. law under the North American Free Trade Agreement and World Trade Organization rules.

The president of the cattle council, Brad Wildeman, warns that failure to get the law repealed will drive some Canadian producers out of business, reduce livestock herds and cost the two industries an estimated $661,376 a year.

Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz could not be reached for comment.

Department officials would not comment directly on the call by producers for Canada to launch a trade challenge, other than to say that the federal government is working to mitigate the law's impact.

The law is called an interim final rule. The challenge is to ensure that the final rule will keep trade distortions to a minimum, said Steve Lavergne, Agriculture Canada's director of bilateral relations for the Americas.


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 9 User Comments
Add a Comment
Not a bad start  11/3/2008 12:36:00 PM
This is a good start to providing better product and access to US labor. The same should be done for all imports especially from Mexico and Asian countries.
Country of origin labeling  11/3/2008 12:37:00 PM
Country of origin labeling is a good thing as consumers want to know where there food is coming from. However, it is wrong for the meat industry to discriminate against cattle that are brought into the U.S (from Canada) as part of a trade agreement (NAFTA).
NAFTA  11/3/2008 12:44:00 PM
I agree that there should be no discrimination if all of the parameters regarding NAFTA have been met. If there is due reason for suspicion of incoming product, no trade agreement should have to be honored. If the provisions of the agreement do not allow for rejection of repeated non-conforming product, it should be amended.
Country of Origin labeling a NECESSITY!   11/3/2008 12:51:00 PM
With revelations over the last 18+ months of criminal activity in food production & processing in China, it is imperative that U.S. consumers demand stricter COOL requirements. All merchandise, whether raw or processed, should clearly be marked with country of original for every ingredient in the product. Currently only raw/unprocessed foods must be labeled. So your cookies made with milk product from China will not have to say they have Chinese ingredients. What a bunch of crap! How does that help the consumer???? I don't see why meat plants are suddenly refusing Canadian livestock, which rarely have problems, while China continues to get away with murder - literally - (4 babies in China & thousands of pets in the U.S.) Canadian livestock producers need to take a different approach to address their grievance. The American Consumer is not going to let the WTO tell us we cannot have COOL - we will demand the U.S. withdraw from the WTO if necessary. Canada, indeed the whole world, should be implementing similar protections for their consumers. While I am all for protecting American jobs, it seems if Canadian livestock producers are able to provide their product less expensively than American producers, the meat packing companies would be crazy not to buy the Canadian livestock. Or, maybe the Canadians can work out an export deal for their cows & pigs with China...
Country of Origin Labeling  11/3/2008 2:17:00 PM
This law is way over due. It just does not go far enough. We should know when non- US ingredients are used in making ediable products. I am sure there is nothing wrong with Canadian beef and pork. This I see as a knee jerk reation taken by meat processing companies in the US. I believe things will work out given time.
limits to feasibility  11/3/2008 3:38:00 PM
While it may be possible to list COO of all ingredients of food products, it is simply not possible for more complex products. Can you imagine trying to list COO of every nut, bolt, hose, and IC in an auto, for example? And what about mulitple sources? Our company buys capacitors from two vendors. Each vendor has factories in three or more countries. Now multiply that by hundreds of components per assembly. Good luck with that COOL.
Economics 101 and COOL  11/3/2008 4:04:00 PM
Unless I'm really missing something the main reason that the meat plants in the U.S. would discriminate by segregating the feedstocks of Canada or any other country is administrative costs and the possibility of making a mistake that later could cost them a ton of money if they were found guilty of not being able to correctly track food source problem. If anyone has forgotten the U.S. has a very litigious society. You have to ask the question, if you were in their shoes what would you do. They want to have a highly competitive product and decent profit margins. They are essentially pushing the problem down and into their supply chain due to a government dictated directive. I'm sure we are going to see a lot more of this if the political change of guard happens. Maybe this is an opportunity for a Canadian only meat packing house in the U.S. to take up the slack.
Not so COOL?  11/3/2008 5:14:00 PM
Each of the respondents has at least one good point, but one thing stands out in my mind that nobody, including the Canadians addressed, namely that the packers and processors are businesses, not governmental entities, and may purchase their livestock from whom ever they wish, assuming of course, that it meets the necessary standards. I believe their slackening in purchasing Canadian meat is one of having to deal with one more labeling situation, or perhaps the recent changes in the dollar value between the two countries.
Maple Leaf Bacon, Chicken, & Cow... Mmmm  11/3/2008 5:38:00 PM
Breakout that Canadian Maple syrup and slather on that dead carcass... Mmmm.


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

 

     



   





Flatbed trucking, flatbed shipping, flatbed carriers



Food/Beverage

Tyson Foods Must Pay $250K In Labor Suit

Candy Maker Cutting 175 Jobs In Minnesota

Snack Makers Utz, Snyder Nix Merger Plan


Chemicals/Petroleum

EPA To Set Standards For PVC Plant Emissions

EPA Extends Time To Comment On Dow Cleanup

Clorox Eliminating Chlorine Over Safety Concerns

Pharmaceuticals/Biotech

Novartis To Make Swine Flu Vaccine From Cells

Novartis To Buy Stake In China's Tianyuan

New FDA Program To Help Curb Accidental Overdoses
News Video